Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Visually represent scarf seam #8166

Open
1 task done
tlhintoq opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

Feature request: Visually represent scarf seam #8166

tlhintoq opened this issue Jan 24, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@tlhintoq
Copy link

Is there an existing issue for this feature request?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Is your feature request related to a problem?

It would be really helpful if scarf seam and regular seam had different colors in gCode preview, especially when using Conditional scarf joint and its values leading to mix of seam types on the same print.

Image

Image

Which printers will be beneficial to this feature?

All

Describe the solution you'd like

I'm trying to work through values for a good conditional scarf joint... but when I can't tell looking at the gCode where a normal seam and where a scarf seam should be, looking at good and bad points on the physical print tells me nothing.

Maybe keep regular seams white and scarf seams black?

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@tlhintoq tlhintoq added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 24, 2025
@henrivdr
Copy link
Contributor

As a intermediate workaround, you can look at the Flow view.
The ramp up in flow along the scarf shows nicely.

@tlhintoq
Copy link
Author

As a intermediate workaround, you can look at the Flow view. The ramp up in flow along the scarf shows nicely.

Thanks! I'll give that a try

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants