Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Support for multi input policies in CrossQ #269

Open
2 tasks done
RaikoPipe opened this issue Jan 8, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks done

[Feature Request] Support for multi input policies in CrossQ #269

RaikoPipe opened this issue Jan 8, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@RaikoPipe
Copy link

RaikoPipe commented Jan 8, 2025

🚀 Feature

Support for multi input policies in CrossQ.

Motivation

The newly implemented CrossQ algorithm doesn't currently support MultiInputPolicy. The algorithm seems promising and I would like to use it for my own custom env, which is a dict env requiring multi input policy support.

Pitch

I implemented the feature in pull request #268. It's a work in progress but might be useful to those who require the feature until an official update is rolled out.

Alternatives

A current alternative lies in switching to the jax version of stable-baselines3 (https://github.com/araffin/sbx), which has minimal support for the feature.

Additional context

No response

Checklist

  • I have checked that there is no similar issue in the repo
  • If I'm requesting a new feature, I have proposed alternatives
@RaikoPipe RaikoPipe added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 8, 2025
@RaikoPipe RaikoPipe changed the title [Feature Request] request title [Feature Request] Support for multi input policies in CrossQ Jan 8, 2025
@araffin
Copy link
Member

araffin commented Jan 13, 2025

Hello,
thanks for the proposal, what is missing currently? where would you need some help?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants