classes implement should respect interface extends

[xenoterracide]

I have

@Value.Immutable
@ValueObject
public interface MyId extends Identifier {
}

and I want to validate

classes().that().implement(Identifier.class).should().haveSimpleNameEndingWith("Id")

even if we agree this is not the right code, I don't see any way to validate the interface. Given I'm using the immutables library, this seems the correct placing.

Additionally, I tried creating an @ImmutableValueObject and annotate it with @ValueObject using immutables @InjectAnnotation and it seems there isn't any way to validate that the annotation exists if it's a composed annotation.

lastly it'd be nice to be able to say something here like

classes().that().implement(Identifier.class).should().haveSimpleNameEndingWith("Id").reflexively()

which would imply

classes().that().implement(Identifier.class).should().haveSimpleNameEndingWith("Id")
classes().that().haveSimpleNameEndingWith("Id").should().implement(Identifier.class)

[hankem]

Are you looking for areAssignableTo (which is linked from the implement documentation)?

[xenoterracide]

Sorry, I guess I didn't read that... I think I looked more in the reference documentation. I wonder if a method named isInstanceOf would be better... Remembering the difference between assignableto and assignablefrom is not great... I'd actually have to look it up