Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Records vs Service Times time_of_day API #4

Open
ericrovtar opened this issue Jul 24, 2014 · 4 comments
Open

Records vs Service Times time_of_day API #4

ericrovtar opened this issue Jul 24, 2014 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@ericrovtar
Copy link

I've noticed that when you make an API call for records, the service_date_time timezone is different than the timezone for time_of_day in a service times API call.

Here's an example for the same service (service time vs record):
2000-01-01 17:30:00Z / 2014-07-12 21:30:00Z

This would seem to be inconsistent, and maybe not by design?

@BryanKetron
Copy link

Hey @ericrovtar! We are planning on making some improvements to our Church Metrics API. Are you still using this API? If so, is there anything we can do to make it better for you?

@ericrovtar
Copy link
Author

Hey, @BryanKetron! Sorry for not seeing this sooner. We are. We do a bunch of custom reporting through the API and we're still using the C# classes I built to interact with it.

The API works great overall.

If anything, there are some "expansion" features that I think would be nice, like the ability to add a comment with a record. That way we can note "Snow Storm" or "Children in Adult Worship" with the numbers.

As for the API, I think it's great. The TimeZone issue up top is really the only "issue" we've seen with it. If you'd like to see how we're using it, let me know. I'd be happy to "give you a tour."

Thanks!

-Eric

@mattdeigh mattdeigh added the bug label Aug 3, 2015
@mattdeigh
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @ericrovtar! We're taking a look at this.

@ericrovtar
Copy link
Author

Awesome. Thanks, @mattdeigh.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants