Can we have a new "<<qualify-widgettree>>" macro? #5943
BurningTreeC
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I would like it to be a shorter name eg: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Hi @BurningTreeC interesting idea. I don't think we should merge it into the core until it is being used by the core, but perhaps that depends on the complexity of the implementation and the value of the usecases. Worth exploring in any case. As for naming, I think I'd favour something like |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I would suggest adding a macro that adds the
footprint
in the widget-tree to the state qualifier like I've already done beforeWe could call it
<<qualify-widgettree>>
or whateverIt would help in generating states that would otherwise be the same using the standard
<<qualify>>
macroBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions