Skip to content

Commit d0330a5

Browse files
Fix non-LFS file in LFS dir (#1647)
Co-authored-by: Asif Tamuri <[email protected]>
1 parent ad00864 commit d0330a5

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-65
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-65
lines changed
Lines changed: 3 additions & 65 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,65 +1,3 @@
1-
## Consumable Availability Scenarios
2-
3-
This README describes the different **scenarios** used in consumable availability analysis. Each scenario corresponds to a specific level of availability of consumables across health facilities and months. The data for these scenarios are stored in columns such as `available_prop_scenario1`, `available_prop_scenario2`, etc., in the `ResourceFile_Consumables_availability_small.csv`. This is generated by the the following scripts - 1. `consumable_availability_estimation.py` generates the `available_prop` column representing the proportion of instances that a consumables is likely to be available given the levels of availability observed during 2018, 2. `generate_consumable_availability_scenarios_for_impact_analysis.py` generates additional scenarios of consumable availability ans appends them to the file generated by the first script.
4-
5-
The scenario names below can be specified as parameters for `cons_availability` under `HealthSystem` when running simulations.
6-
7-
---
8-
9-
### **Base Scenario**
10-
- `default`
11-
- **Description:** Actual 2018 availability estimates based on OpenLMIS data.
12-
- **Purpose:** Serves as the baseline for comparisons.
13-
14-
---
15-
16-
### **Scenarios 1–5: System-Level Improvements at Level 1a + 1b **
17-
These are based on regression analysis performed in [Mohan et al (2024)](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38762283/).
18-
19-
| Scenario | Column Name | Description |
20-
|----------|---------------------------|-------------|
21-
| 1 | `scenario1` | All items perform like *non-drug/diagnostic* consumables. |
22-
| 2 | `scenario2` | Scenario 1 + all items match performance of *vital* medicines. |
23-
| 3 | `scenario3` | Scenario 2 + all facilities match those managed by *pharmacists*. |
24-
| 4 | `scenario4` | Scenario 3 + Level 1a facilities perform like Level 1b. |
25-
| 5 | `scenario5` | Scenario 4 + All facilities perform like *CHAM* facilities. |
26-
27-
---
28-
29-
### **Scenarios 6–9: Benchmarking Against Best Facilities**
30-
| Scenario | Column Name | Description |
31-
|----------|---------------------------|-------------|
32-
| 6 | `scenario6` | All Level 1a/1b facilities match the *75th percentile* facility for each item. |
33-
| 7 | `scenario7` | Same as above but using the *90th percentile*. |
34-
| 8 | `scenario8` | Same as above but using the *99th percentile*. |
35-
| 9 | `scenario9` | Level 1a, 1b, and 2 facilities match the *99th percentile*. |
36-
37-
---
38-
39-
### **Scenarios 10–11: Horizontal Supply Chain Alignment**
40-
| Scenario | Column Name | Description |
41-
|----------|---------------------------|-------------|
42-
| 10 | `scenario10` | All programs perform as well as *HIV* programs (only levels 1a and 1b updated). |
43-
| 11 | `scenario11` | All programs perform as well as *EPI* programs (only levels 1a and 1b updated). |
44-
45-
Scenarios 6-8 and 10-11 only include levels 1a and 1b where most of the service is delivered and consumable availability is particularly a challenge to match up with the regression-analysis-based scenarios 1-5
46-
47-
---
48-
49-
### **Scenarios 12–15: HIV Drug Supply Adjustments**
50-
| Scenario | Column Name | Description |
51-
|----------|---------------------------|-------------|
52-
| 12 | `scenario12` | HIV performs as well (i.e. as badly) as general programs (excluding EPI and Cancer), benchmarked at *Facility_Level*. |
53-
| 13 | `scenario13` | HIV performs as well as other programs, benchmarked at *Facility_ID*. |
54-
| 14 | `scenario14` | Same as Scenario 13, but availability scaled *up* by 25%. |
55-
| 15 | `scenario15` | Same as Scenario 13, but availability scaled *down* by 25%. |
56-
57-
---
58-
59-
### **Upper Bound Scenario**
60-
- **`all`**
61-
- **Description:** All consumables are always available (i.e., 100% availability).
62-
- **Purpose:** Represents the theoretical upper bound for health gains due to supply improvements.
63-
64-
---
65-
1+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
2+
oid sha256:8caacbfcbf94df4a24a2bba66a71bf8f89514527dd32409a2e9d3bc69e177bfe
3+
size 3913

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)