You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hierarchical collision detection can greatly reduce the computational cost of performing what would otherwise be brute-force collision detection. However, performing these hierarchical calculations introduces numerical discontinuities. For instance, the noninterference constraint value might jump as the "interference" changes from comparing two spheres to four.
We already handle jumps in min/max constraints through constraint aggregation, which enables them to stay differentiable. I'm curious if we can blend the CD values in a similar way. For instance, if the first check uses a single hierarchical recursion and the second uses two recursions, can the constraint be treated in an aggregated manner?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hierarchical collision detection can greatly reduce the computational cost of performing what would otherwise be brute-force collision detection. However, performing these hierarchical calculations introduces numerical discontinuities. For instance, the noninterference constraint value might jump as the "interference" changes from comparing two spheres to four.
We already handle jumps in min/max constraints through constraint aggregation, which enables them to stay differentiable. I'm curious if we can blend the CD values in a similar way. For instance, if the first check uses a single hierarchical recursion and the second uses two recursions, can the constraint be treated in an aggregated manner?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: