Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Test crashes on i686 with mpich #397

Open
opoplawski opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Test crashes on i686 with mpich #397

opoplawski opened this issue Mar 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
@WardF

Comments

@opoplawski
Copy link
Contributor

To report a non-security related issue, please provide:

  • the version of the software with which you are encountering an issue
  • environmental information (i.e. Operating System, compiler info, java version, python version, etc.)
  • a description of the issue with the steps needed to reproduce it

If you have a general question about the software, please view our Suggested Support Process.

Building netcdf-fortran 4.5.4 and 4.6.0 on Fedora with:

mpich-4.0.3-1.fc39
gcc-13.0.1-0.10.fc39

we see the following failure on i686:

FAIL: run_f90_par_test.sh
=========================

Testing netCDF parallel I/O through the F90 API.
  
 *** Testing netCDF-4 parallel I/O from Fortran 90.
 *** SUCCESS!
  
 *** Testing netCDF-4 parallel I/O with strided access.
 *** SUCCESS!
  
 *** Testing netCDF-4 parallel I/O with fill values.
 *** SUCCESS!
           0           1           1           1           3           1           1   1.00000000       2.00000000       3.00000000    
           7           4           4           1           3           1           1   22.0000000       23.0000000       24.0000000    
           1           4           1           1           3           1           1   4.00000000       5.00000000       6.00000000    
           4           1           3           1           3           1           1   13.0000000       14.0000000       15.0000000    
           5           4           3           1           3           1           1   16.0000000       17.0000000       18.0000000    
           2           1           2           1           3           1           1   7.00000000       8.00000000       9.00000000    
           6           1           4           1           3           1           1   19.0000000       20.0000000       21.0000000    
           3           4           2           1           3           1           1   10.0000000       11.0000000       12.0000000    
 *** Testing fill values with parallel I/O.
 *** SUCCESS!
 *** Testing compressed data writes with parallel I/O.
munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer
Fatal glibc error: malloc.c:2593 (sysmalloc): assertion failed: (old_top == initial_top (av) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= MINSIZE && prev_inuse (old_top) && ((unsigned long) old_end & (pagesize - 1)) == 0)

Program received signal SIGABRT: Process abort signal.
Fatal glibc error: malloc.c:2593 (sysmalloc): assertion failed: (old_top == initial_top (av) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= MINSIZE && prev_inuse (old_top) && ((unsigned long) old_end & (pagesize - 1)) == 0)

Program received signal SIGABRT: Process abort signal.

Backtrace for this error:

Backtrace for this error:

Program received signal SIGABRT: Process abort signal.

Backtrace for this error:
#0  0xf7a192f5 in ???
#1  0xf7a1840d in ???
#2  0xf7f3559f in ???
#3  0xf7f35589 in ???
#4  0xf7876466 in ???
#5  0xf78222a4 in ???
#6  0xf780a36f in ???
#7  0xf780b2d8 in ???
#8  0xf781a3f6 in ???
#9  0xf7884769 in ???
#10  0xf7885583 in ???
#11  0xf788614e in ???
#0  0xf7a192f5 in ???
#1  0xf7a1840d in ???
#2  0xf7f6459f in ???
#3  0xf7f64589 in ???
#4  0xf789f466 in ???
#5  0xf784b2a4 in ???
#6  0xf783336f in ???
#7  0xf78342d8 in ???
#8  0xf78aab6c in ???
#9  0xf78aae7a in ???
#10  0xf78af37c in ???
#12  0xf70a2195 in ???
#13  0xf6d4a6ec in ???
#14  0xf6d4b000 in ???
#11  0xf7218e08 in ???
#15  0xf6ad4e11 in ???
#12  0xf7185b63 in ???
#16  0xf6d1c75b in ???
#17  0xf6cffda5 in ???
#18  0xf6d08b20 in ???
#19  0xf6ad2dc9 in ???
#20  0xf767a955 in ???
#21  0xf767ad71 in ???
#22  0xf762188e in ???
#13  0xf711cc43 in ???
#14  0xf717743d in ???
#15  0xf7177551 in ???
#16  0xf702341d in ???
#17  0xf6d49763 in ???
#18  0xf6d4b000 in ???
#19  0xf6ad4e11 in ???
#20  0xf6d1c75b in ???
#21  0xf6cffda5 in ???
#22  0xf6d08b20 in ???
#23  0xf6ad2dc9 in ???
#24  0xf76a3955 in ???
#25  0xf76a3d71 in ???
#26  0xf764a88e in ???
#23  0xf7e94ffd in nf_put_vara_real_
        at ../../fortran/nf_varaio.F90:372
#27  0xf7ec3ffd in nf_put_vara_real_
        at ../../fortran/nf_varaio.F90:372
#24  0xf7ef4725 in __netcdf_MOD_nf90_put_var_4d_fourbytereal
        at ../../fortran/netcdf_expanded.F90:1035
#28  0xf7f23725 in __netcdf_MOD_nf90_put_var_4d_fourbytereal
        at ../../fortran/netcdf_expanded.F90:1035
#25  0x565ed8ed in f90tst_parallel_compressed
        at ../../nf03_test4/f90tst_parallel_compressed.F90:261
#26  0x565eb5c2 in main
        at ../../nf03_test4/f90tst_parallel_compressed.F90:16
#29  0x565aa8ed in f90tst_parallel_compressed
        at ../../nf03_test4/f90tst_parallel_compressed.F90:261
#30  0x565a85c2 in main
        at ../../nf03_test4/f90tst_parallel_compressed.F90:16
#0  0xf7a192f5 in ???
#1  0xf7a1840d in ???
#2  0xf7f3459f in ???
#3  0xf7f34589 in ???
#4  0xf7876466 in ???
#5  0xf78222a4 in ???
#6  0xf780a36f in ???
#7  0xf780b2d8 in ???
#8  0xf781a3f6 in ???
#9  0xf7884769 in ???
#10  0xf7885583 in ???
#11  0xf788614e in ???
#12  0xf6b9d9b5 in ???
#13  0xf6d4a63d in ???
#14  0xf6d4b000 in ???
#15  0xf6ad4e11 in ???
#16  0xf6d1c75b in ???
#17  0xf6cffda5 in ???
#18  0xf6d08b20 in ???
#19  0xf6ad2dc9 in ???
#20  0xf767a955 in ???
#21  0xf767ad71 in ???
#22  0xf762188e in ???
#23  0xf7e93ffd in nf_put_vara_real_
        at ../../fortran/nf_varaio.F90:372
#24  0xf7ef3725 in __netcdf_MOD_nf90_put_var_4d_fourbytereal
        at ../../fortran/netcdf_expanded.F90:1035
#25  0x565f58ed in f90tst_parallel_compressed
        at ../../nf03_test4/f90tst_parallel_compressed.F90:261
#26  0x565f35c2 in main
        at ../../nf03_test4/f90tst_parallel_compressed.F90:16

===================================================================================
=   BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
=   PID 59003 RUNNING AT f32bc652ea574bef9471ec7e57bde6e8
=   EXIT CODE: 9
=   CLEANING UP REMAINING PROCESSES
=   YOU CAN IGNORE THE BELOW CLEANUP MESSAGES
===================================================================================
YOUR APPLICATION TERMINATED WITH THE EXIT STRING: Terminated (signal 15)
This typically refers to a problem with your application.
Please see the FAQ page for debugging suggestions
FAIL run_f90_par_test.sh (exit status: 143)
@opoplawski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note that from a Fedora perspective this isn't an issue since we are dropping i686 builds. Not sure if you care about 32-bit support upstream.

@WardF WardF self-assigned this Apr 3, 2023
@WardF
Copy link
Member

WardF commented Apr 3, 2023

Good to know; 32-bit builds/tests are still important to us, although they are becoming less easy to test without maintaining physical i686 hardware. I'll take a look!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@WardF WardF

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@opoplawski @WardF