-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Description
Hello netCDF folks
I was at an OGC meeting where @ethanrd was describing some work on the NUG
I would like to highlight and discuss with the community one facet that would be massively useful for our group, working on https://github.com/opengeospatial/netcdf-ld and a valuable way to establish good practice for publishing controlled terms
we looked a while ago at the now defunct (404ing) resource https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/attribute_conventions.html
it appears that there are 11 controlled attribute names within the NUG
We extracted these and presented them in a linked data registry which we own, but which has no links to Unidata nor netCDF
http://def.scitools.org.uk/NetCDF
this is illustrative, but absolutely not definitive nor endorsed by netCDF / Unidata
The crucial facets of this approach are:
- each individual attribute term is defined by a fully qualified unique URI
- rdf:type is defined as rdfs:Property
- rdfs:domain is defined as https://www.opengis.net/def/binary-array-ld/Resource
- rdfs:range is defined as rdf:Literal
- for any attribute where the value is not from a controlled vocabulary (all of NUG terms, I think)
we would like to investigate with Unidata how to go about establishing that this list is valid, and how to publish the list as a linked data resource set using a controlled and authoritative namespace that demonstrates that a new published list is an authoritative
many thanks
marqh