You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 18, 2023. It is now read-only.
As the picture shows , the collision may detect the block under the ground without any blocks' connection and made them as one BIG ship (combining the water, lava, blocks form other mods, etc) .
Its quite common to happen in the server when there are lots of entities (especially with many players around the ship), which cause the low TPS.
I just add the limitation of the Y-axis in the implement of .class tryExpanding and it seems to work fine, which let the blocks under 58 can't be constructed.
protected void tryExpanding(int x, int y, int z, int hash) { if (isValidExpansion(x, y, z) && y > 58) { // totalCalls++; if (!foundSet.contains(hash) && (foundSet.size() + nextQueue.size() < maxSize)) { nextQueue.add(hash); } } }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
As the picture shows , the collision may detect the block under the ground without any blocks' connection and made them as one BIG ship (combining the water, lava, blocks form other mods, etc) .
Its quite common to happen in the server when there are lots of entities (especially with many players around the ship), which cause the low TPS.
I just add the limitation of the Y-axis in the implement of .class tryExpanding and it seems to work fine, which let the blocks under 58 can't be constructed.
protected void tryExpanding(int x, int y, int z, int hash) { if (isValidExpansion(x, y, z) && y > 58) { // totalCalls++; if (!foundSet.contains(hash) && (foundSet.size() + nextQueue.size() < maxSize)) { nextQueue.add(hash); } } }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: