Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assembly is not strongly named (signed) #16

Open
dahall opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Assembly is not strongly named (signed) #16

dahall opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@dahall
Copy link
Contributor

dahall commented Apr 18, 2018

In order to use this assembly in Visual Studio Extensions, it must be signed.

@cakkermans
Copy link
Contributor

Hi David,

Do you really need strong naming? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16447324/do-visual-studio-extensions-vsix-need-to-be-strong-named

I have had some mixed experiences with using strong named assemblies in situations where there were version conflicts. JSON.NET was an example and I was not alone.

The tide seems to be to avoid strong naming.

Any thoughts?

@dahall
Copy link
Contributor Author

dahall commented May 14, 2018

Yes, because I'm depending on other assemblies that are signed and you can't mix. I have deployed multiple libraries on NuGet and have strongly named them all without any issue for many years with over a million downloads on one of them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants