Skip to content

Commit 4b53840

Browse files
authored
Editorial: Fix bad linking due to removed ContinuationPriority (#103)
1 parent ab9bdc9 commit 4b53840

File tree

1 file changed

+5
-5
lines changed

1 file changed

+5
-5
lines changed

spec/security.md

+5-5
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -72,11 +72,11 @@ possible for an attacker to further reduce the set of potential tasks that can
7272
run instead of its own by leveraging this priority. For example, if a UA uses a
7373
simple static prioritization scheme spanning all event loops in a thread, then
7474
using "{{TaskPriority/user-blocking}}" {{Scheduler/postTask()}} tasks or
75-
"{{ContinuationPriority/user-visible}}" and higher priority
76-
{{Scheduler/yield()}} continuations — which are meant to have a higher
77-
event loop priority — instead of {{Window/postMessage(message,
78-
options)|postMessage()}} tasks might decrease this set, depending on their
79-
relative prioritization and what runs between.
75+
"{{TaskPriority/user-visible}}" and higher priority {{Scheduler/yield()}}
76+
continuations — which are meant to have a higher event loop priority
77+
— instead of {{Window/postMessage(message, options)|postMessage()}} tasks
78+
might decrease this set, depending on their relative prioritization and what
79+
runs between.
8080

8181
**What Mitigations are Possible?** <br/>
8282
There are mitigations that implementers can consider to minimize the risk:

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)