You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think this should be the other way around?
Degeneracy for the s -> s+1 transition should be g_{s+1}/g_s. Should check in the code that this is correctly implemented.
Also, there is one degeneracy but two levels provided by the user? Which one does it correspond to?
If it's both, maybe the user should have the option to set g1 and g2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi! The degeneracy term comes in when deriving the emission coefficients based on the principle of detailed balance (for defects with multiple levels):
As the emission coefficients are proportional to either g_s/g_{s+1} or g_{s+1}/g_s depending on the capture process, it's easier to input a ratio of g=g_s/g_{s+1}
And in the source code, g or 1/g is properly used in the corresponding equations
But thanks for asking and I'll add more details about this point in tutorials
I think this should be the other way around?
Degeneracy for the s -> s+1 transition should be g_{s+1}/g_s. Should check in the code that this is correctly implemented.
Also, there is one degeneracy but two levels provided by the user? Which one does it correspond to?
If it's both, maybe the user should have the option to set
g1
andg2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: