-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 562
Replies: 4 comments · 9 replies
-
While the Vulkan backend should perform better than OpenGL, OpenGL support tends to be more mature than Vulkan support in a number of graphics drivers / platforms (at this time - and especially if using older drivers). We've had a few reports of oddities with Vulkan performance on Linux that have been resolved when replacing / updating graphics drivers (or the whole graphics stack). If you're up for installing Are you using any WZ mods? And what build of WZ were you using? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Is it of the to old Vulkan version? (1.2.141) (K)Ubuntu 21.04 will have a newer Vulkan version. Maybe i have time to test with a live image of the beta version from (K)Ubuntu.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
I also have less FPS with a Vulkan. In some scenes, by almost a third (900 instead of 1400 sk-rush), in others the same (800 at the beginning of the beta campaign). I can't make a real scene with a FPS drawdown. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
This is a bit of a different situation, given that you are disabling vsync. WZ does not optimize for 1000s of FPS with vsync disabled (and I'm not sure how accurate the FPS indicator in-game actually is in such a circumstance). I'm glad both are getting plenty of FPS. 😄 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
I ran the test still on my laptop |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
hmm... you have an older Kernel and older CPU/GPS but higher FPS. interesting... tested now also Beta Campaign beginning. still about the same FPS as above. I have a resolution of 2560x1440. I also tested with a resolution of 1920x1080 (display still have 2560x1440) and gut a bit higher FPS of 60 with opengl |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
A friend of mine has random GPU performance problems on the i7-1065G7 (Iris® Plus Graphics) . |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
While this is a slightly older article, it provides an example of a configuration where Vulkan performance is actually worse:
So while there's more we can do in the backend, it's also possible that the drivers have their own impact. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
Some notes:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
👍 1
-
i tried now with the 4.0.0beta1 deb package. About the same FPS as before. but got now a graphic glitch with vulkan and yes i will use opengl as long it performs better. only want to help to get vulkan support better as i think it would be the future. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
👍 1
-
i did some more tests. it looks like the antialiasing drops the FPS very fast.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
@ximex: Ah - it doesn't surprise me much that antialiasing would be a culprit. Glad to hear with antialiasing off you get 60FPS. That's a fascinating graphical glitch though - huh |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions
-
they stay where they are. no flickering |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I was testing the new Vulkan API and i'm wondering that the performance is really bad. I got ~57 FPS with OpenGL but only ~16 FPS with Vulkan. Shouldn't be Vulkan better than OpenGL?
Is there anything that i should test or logs that i should send?
System:
OS: Kubuntu 20.10
CPU: Intel i7-8550U
GPU: Intel UHD Graphics 620
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions