You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Update the endpoint to be able to take this parameterized value of NODATA.
Support More Rasters
MapShed requires touching 8 raster data sets, although a single field needs at most 3. Currently we have an implementation that can handle at most 3, with the intent that we will make different calls for different combinations.
However, if there are many combinations, and we end up downloading the same set of tiles over and over again (for example, almost all of them use NLCD), then it may be more efficient to do one big join over all the datasets, and then filter out the necessary combinations in Python instead.
If this is the case, we should allow supporting up to 8 rasters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Avenues for potential improvement, if time / budget allows.
NODATA
specification in input JSONIn
SummaryJob
, we handleNODATA
in the Soil raster by converting it to a hard-code value: https://github.com/WikiWatershed/mmw-geoprocessing/blob/develop/summary/src/main/scala/SummaryJob.scala#L105-L108. In this case, since the order of the layers is not known, and different layers may have different preferred values forNODATA
, the consumers would like to specify it in the request, perhaps as follows:Update the endpoint to be able to take this parameterized value of
NODATA
.Support More Rasters
MapShed requires touching 8 raster data sets, although a single field needs at most 3. Currently we have an implementation that can handle at most 3, with the intent that we will make different calls for different combinations.
However, if there are many combinations, and we end up downloading the same set of tiles over and over again (for example, almost all of them use NLCD), then it may be more efficient to do one big join over all the datasets, and then filter out the necessary combinations in Python instead.
If this is the case, we should allow supporting up to 8 rasters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: