QLever Stable Releases? #2209
Closed
ahankinson
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Definitly LTS versions are a must feature for a product. QLever is fortunately on the way to being a product. To get there this is a major step. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
This is on the roadmap for later this year. And kind of financial support for efforts like this is greatly appreciated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It's great to see QLever being so actively developed!
However, we've been bitten a couple times by updates that broke something fundamental. We are still in pre-production for our service, so it's not a huge deal, but in thinking about our roadmap, it would be great to know it there was a "stable" channel we could follow.
Is there a plan for some form of "stable / develop" branch split, or tagged releases in GitHub? It doesn't really matter what they're called, or the frequency at which the "stable" versions are published, but some form of release management with a tagged version would be helpful. (Otherwise we have to rely on the GitHub SHAs for knowing, specifically, which version is running.)
Many thanks for building this amazing tool.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions