mAP and your weight file ?

[wjtan99]

I trained as you suggested by changing TEST.EVAL to Flase, and adding TEST.TEST_SIZE=800.

python main.py --config_file configs/veri_r101.yml

I only got the follow results (not done yet, but the results are not expected to change much):

Train Epoch: [74][1801/1888] Time 0.199 (0.230) Loss 1.0569 (1.0329) Acc 100.00 (99.55) lr 5e-06
=> Test
Evaluating veri ...
Extracted features for query set, obtained 1678-by-2048 matrix
Extracted features for gallery set, obtained 11579-by-2048 matrix
=> BatchTime(s)/BatchSize(img): 0.007/100
Computing CMC and mAP
Results ----------
mAP: 65.7%
CMC curve
Rank-1 : 91.3%
Rank-5 : 96.0%
Rank-10 : 98.0%

Computing CMC and mAP
Re-Ranked Results--
mAP: 76.4%
CMC curve
Rank-1 : 92.7%
Rank-5 : 95.4%
Rank-10 : 96.2%

This is way worse than your published results.
Can you suggest what was wrong and can you share your weight file?

[wjtan99]

I found that was due to the image size was set to 128*128. For this size, my results are better than the results in the Table 5 of the WACV paper.

[adhirajghosh]

Hi, thanks for your issue. May I close it now that you resolved it yourself?

[wjtan99]

I still cannot get mAP=88 for 240×240. Can you share your weight file?

[wjtan99]

I finished training input size = 240. However the mAP is about the same as for input size = 128. I am wondering how you got the results in Table 5. Can you share your weight files?
Thanks a lot.