Skip to content

Fielded format modifications #210

Open
@golnazads

Description

@golnazads

A user has requested six addition/modification for Endpoint format

1- Add editor to Endnote, in addition to authors. For example for bibcode 2007LNP...720..403W
add
%E Papantonopoulos, Lefteris

ADS, ProCite, Refman, and Medlars do not include editor.

RefWorks in classic includes editor with author tag
A1 Papantonopoulos, Lefteris
however, from https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/RefWorks/Legacy_RefWorks/05Managing_References/020RefWorks_Tagged_Format
apparently tag for editor is A2. Hence add editor with tag A2 to RefWorks format.

2- Page range should be displayed for endnote if available instead of just start page. For example for bibcode 2000A&AS..146..141P
page should be
%P 141-155

ADS, ProCite, Refman, and RefWorks correctly format start and end page with their respective tags.

Medlars also need page range displayed as
PG - 141-155

3- Display title book with its own tag for endnote. For example for bibcode 2007LNP...720..403W we have
"pub":"The Invisible Universe: Dark Matter and Dark Energy",
"title":["Avoiding Dark Energy with 1/R Modifications of Gravity"],

which export formats for Endnote
%J The Invisible Universe: Dark Matter and Dark Energy
while classic has
%T Avoiding Dark Energy with 1/R Modifications of Gravity
%B The Invisible Universe: Dark Matter and Dark Energy

From: https://sourceforge.net/p/bibus-biblio/bugs/_discuss/thread/9f7f2644/3273/attachment/EndNote_Format_EndNoteX1WinManual.pdf
there are
%B Secondary Title
(of a Book or Conference Name)
%J Secondary Title (Journal Name)
my understanding is that it should be decide which tag to include, %B or %J, based on doctype. On the side of BibTex book title is included for doctypes of inbook, proceedings, and in proceedings. So I am guessing it could be the same here. @aaccomazzi

As far as I can tell the other four fielded formats are OK, and do not require different tags for publication based on doctype.

4- Display the field publication. Need to find out the status of this field in solr.

The same user also requested two other modifications,
For Theses:
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PhDT.......120R/abstract

  • the university is listed as %+ (author address) but it would be more helpful under %I (University) [or perhaps under both?]
  • I don’t know if there is a way to parse out “advisor” from the %Z list, but if so, that could be listed under %Y

Export does not do any parsing of the fields, it displays everything as is. @aaccomazzi thoughts?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions