You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
Ok so this typo I found while reading 07_ensemble_learning_and_random_forests.ipynb
In the markdown cell after cell number Out[44] we can see it is written: "The linear SVM is far outperformed by the other classifiers. However, let's keep it for now since it may improve the voting classifier's performance."
But as we can see the score for LinearSVC is the least i.e. 0.8662.
Expected behavior
Instead we can write: "The Linear SVM is actually the worst-performing model among the four, with a score of 0.8662, which is lower than the other three models. Instead Extra Trees is the best-performing model among the four, with a score of 0.9743."
Screenshots
Here we can see it is written Linear SVM is far outperformed instead it should be underperformed.
Versions (please complete the following information):
OS: [MacOSX 14.5]
Python: [3.11.9]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
minamisatokun
changed the title
Instead of underperforming it is written outperforming in 07_ensemble_learning_and_random_forests.ipynb
[BUG] Instead of underperforming it is written outperforming in 07_ensemble_learning_and_random_forests.ipynb
Jul 28, 2024
Describe the bug
Ok so this typo I found while reading 07_ensemble_learning_and_random_forests.ipynb
In the markdown cell after cell number Out[44] we can see it is written: "The linear SVM is far outperformed by the other classifiers. However, let's keep it for now since it may improve the voting classifier's performance."
But as we can see the score for LinearSVC is the least i.e. 0.8662.
Expected behavior
Instead we can write: "The Linear SVM is actually the worst-performing model among the four, with a score of 0.8662, which is lower than the other three models. Instead Extra Trees is the best-performing model among the four, with a score of 0.9743."
Screenshots
Here we can see it is written Linear SVM is far outperformed instead it should be underperformed.
Versions (please complete the following information):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: