License of this library, GPL or LGPL? #949
Unanswered
SpieringsAE
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
@SpieringsAE : trying to get legal advice on github - is likely the wrong place. As for your questions of libiio, there are two groups of files in this repo:
What this means is you can use the library, under the LGPL, as long as your downstream users can replace/update the library when they want (either dynamically linking it, or by providing them the *.a files so they can rebuild things by hand - either is OK). -Robin |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm pretty new to the open source software environment, and 100% new to the legal side of it. And as I have a lot of respect for open source software and its creators I wish to handle this correctly.
I'm currently making a an open source project that uses this library, however I do not wish to use a GPL license on my project as I fear most of the people that use it would be strongly turned away by this. Under an LGPL license I can do this by using a dynamically linked library, but as I understand under a GPL license I can't.
The repository indicates both licenses so I'm not sure what my options are. Should I listen to the LGPL license which benefits me, or to the GPL license which hinders me?
To give a more clear picture of what is happening: I'm making a Matlab/Simulink blockset that will compile to C code and then machine code for an embedded Linux system which has IIO interfaces. It is this blockset that I wish to open source, but whatever someone else builds with it I would like to be free from the GPL license.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions