You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Weaknesses of/Issues with current AnVIL Study Pages
Consent groups are hard to interpret.
“Not applicable” should be changed to “Consortium-access only”
You cannot click to learn more about a given study, unless you click “apply for access” and go over to dbGAP
Do not do less than dbGAP ...
Cannot see cases vs. Controls, population composition, etc.
Mendelian – possibly not descriptive enough
Should link or reflect the data model (or data dictionary) used and their variables
Provide the list of available variables and phenotypes, possibly use PhenX
Provide project description by cohort, if many cohorts are available in a study
Track and explain dataset versions
Make most fields searchable, with auto-completion available when possible.
Link study pages to “special publications” (meaning have workspaces with primary and secondary data, analysis workflows, etc.), for example for the T2T workspace and its publication, and any upcoming CCDG or HGRP ‘marker’ publications.
How to facilitate data browsing and searches, while balancing between open and controlled access metadata and phenotype data
NHGRI to look into: Documentation about how granular the clinical metadata can be revealed publicly
Miscellaneous Ideas
AnVIL Staff should consider how to facilitate the generation of and support the posting of supplementary files for landmark studies (e.g., T2T)
Overarching:
What is our goal for these study pages? What should one be able to accomplish?
Users should be able to determine whether a study is useful to their scientific interests/question
Disease area / Clinical data
Type of molecular data
Number of cases vs. Controls
What type of information should be displayed?
Where do we get this information? (Study Registration? dbGaP Study Pages?)
What flexibility do we want to remain in the system?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
NoopDog
changed the title
Improvements to AnVIL Study Pages
Improve utility of AnVIL Study Detail Pages
Feb 16, 2023
Original source doc
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tkJTHNz5jqLzvvdH0faSp6v9MYPkknWM/edit#heading=h.gjdgxs
Weaknesses of/Issues with current AnVIL Study Pages
NHGRI to look into: Documentation about how granular the clinical metadata can be revealed publicly
Miscellaneous Ideas
AnVIL Staff should consider how to facilitate the generation of and support the posting of supplementary files for landmark studies (e.g., T2T)
Overarching:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: