Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unbalanced RAW NVME disks usage #12069

Open
ksqrtr opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Unbalanced RAW NVME disks usage #12069

ksqrtr opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@ksqrtr
Copy link

ksqrtr commented Mar 4, 2025

Hello!

We have 4 NVME disks and noticed recently that their usage is some kind of unbalanced:

# for nvme in 0 1 2 3; do echo "nvme${nvme}:"; smartctl -x /dev/nvme"${nvme}"n1 | grep 'Data Units' | sed 's/^/    /' ; done
nvme0:
    Data Units Read:                    127 608 511 556 [65,3 PB]
    Data Units Written:                 293 649 334 [150 TB]
nvme1:
    Data Units Read:                    129 983 891 432 [66,5 PB]
    Data Units Written:                 384 164 362 [196 TB]
nvme2:
    Data Units Read:                    562 268 [287 GB]
    Data Units Written:                 8 382 370 [4,29 TB]
nvme3:
    Data Units Read:                    551 991 [282 GB]
    Data Units Written:                 8 387 551 [4,29 TB]

What might be the cause of such usage unbalance and is there any options in ATS we can tune?

Our storage.config is pretty straightforward:

# cat storage.config 
/dev/crypt-nvme-luks-S2UDNX0J602140
/dev/crypt-nvme-luks-S2UDNX0J402480
/dev/crypt-nvme-luks-S2UDNX0J602013
/dev/crypt-nvme-luks-S2UDNX0J602462

We are using ATS 9.2.8.

@ksqrtr ksqrtr changed the title Unbalanced NVME disks' usage Unbalanced NVME disks usage Mar 4, 2025
@ksqrtr ksqrtr changed the title Unbalanced NVME disks usage Unbalanced RAW NVME disks usage Mar 4, 2025
@cmcfarlen
Copy link
Contributor

There could be a few reasons for this. Could you share your cache config and volume config along with some sample urls? If the same urls are updated frequently then they would all write to the same disk.

@cmcfarlen cmcfarlen self-assigned this Mar 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants