Skip to content

Question about GAN loss #3

Open
@Nevermetyou65

Description

@Nevermetyou65

Hello Sir, Thanks for a very useful repository about GANs.

Would mind clarifying something about GAN loss? It's about the "sign" return by d_loss_fn and g_loss_fn in this snippet.

def get_loss_fn():
    def d_loss_fn(real_logits, fake_logits):
        return -tf.reduce_mean(tf.math.log(real_logits + 1e-10) + tf.math.log(1. - fake_logits + 1e-10))

    def g_loss_fn(fake_logits):
        return -tf.reduce_mean(tf.math.log(fake_logits + 1e-10))

    return d_loss_fn, 

Is this just a binary crossentropy? if it's just a binary crossentropy can I use the loss defined in DCGAN?
And you put a minus sign to make a positive return value am I correct?
I find that your implementation is the closest to those implemented in papers but slightly different in the sign of value.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions