[GRPC] Is there a way to "flatten" the input arguments when using grpc source? #5686
Unanswered
nickaguilarh
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I'm experiencing a similar issue mentioned here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
You can add a new field within additionalTypeDefs and point it to the existing field. Other than that, there is no "flattening" transform. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
So, rigth now I have the following:
I'm looking for a way (I don't know if it is possible) to "remove" the "input" argument and just leave the "username" argument.

Something like this:
I'm thinking about expanding the scheme and replace but would be kind of repetitive. I also understand that this is to send the correct type to the remote GRPC server but could be it like a hidded "_input" argument? Just throwing some random ideas here.
PS: Hope this is a good place for this question, I wasn't sure if i had to publish it on issues or not.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions