You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey @asahi417 , great work , extremely useful set of models !
I have a custom data set which involves product related information, want to use your models for Q&A pair generation. So far, I found E2E QAG is performing better than Multi Task and Pipeline in generating meaningful Q&A pairs.
I tried different text prompt prefix strings , to my context which seemed to improve Q&A pairs a little, but , not by much. Do you have any additional tips on generating more meaningful and contextually valid Q&A pairs with these models, other than manipulating generate function like more beams ?
P.S: Example of what I tried prefix -> "This is a product metadata, generate Q&A pairs which regular shoppers would have " , context " Contains milk, eggs, shellfish fragments etc". Input if prefix + context to generate method.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey @asahi417 , great work , extremely useful set of models !
I have a custom data set which involves product related information, want to use your models for Q&A pair generation. So far, I found E2E QAG is performing better than Multi Task and Pipeline in generating meaningful Q&A pairs.
I tried different text prompt prefix strings , to my context which seemed to improve Q&A pairs a little, but , not by much. Do you have any additional tips on generating more meaningful and contextually valid Q&A pairs with these models, other than manipulating generate function like more beams ?
P.S: Example of what I tried prefix -> "This is a product metadata, generate Q&A pairs which regular shoppers would have " , context " Contains milk, eggs, shellfish fragments etc". Input if prefix + context to generate method.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: