On error in `uvx`, hint on proper `--verbose` usage if it was provided to the subcommand

[zanieb]

Summary

When uv fails with an internal error, people will re-run it with --verbose but can accidentally provide --verbose to the subcommand instead. We should hint in this situation

Example

e.g.,

uvx foo-does-not-exist --verbose

if we fail to resolve the package, we should notice the user provided --verbose and hint

error: ...

hint: You provided `--verbose` to `foo-does-not-exist`, did you mean to provide it to uv? e.g., with `uvx --verbose foo-does-not-exist`

[CarlosEduR]

I am new here, but I'd like to give it a try :). Can I work on it?

[zanieb]

Feel free! It might be a little tricky to capture the error... maybe you'll want to write a function that wraps

uv/crates/uv/src/commands/tool/run.rs

Line 85 in 5c71b5c

pub(crate) async fn run(