OSS Community Research: Survey to determine which tutorials are most needed by users #379
Replies: 5 comments 9 replies
-
My suggestions:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
My suggestion is regarding the Streetlights tutorial (Interactive) as some of the browsers do not support Katacoda.com and their tutorials. And also, I came up with this news https://www.oreilly.com/online-learning/leveraging-katacoda-technology.html that Katacoda is shutting down its services within 20 days. So, we should think to make our present tutorials on other platforms also. The smart Lightning application is the basic AsyncAPI tutorial that can help beginner users to understand it and this tutorial can be taken as an introduction to AsyncAPI for all the newcomers to AsyncAPI. Regarding moving to other platforms, my suggestion will be to use Glitch or Replit or any other good platforms (if anyone knows) for the creation of new tutorials as well. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
we need tutorials on:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Some more content proposal. So what we have under getting started tutorials is:
We are missing a lot 😅 Below is what we need. It is existing docs mixed with the ones I propose:
New navigation
Writing them is a huge learning experience 💪🏼 just 12 new docs 😄 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello all, IDK if this topic is considered closed, but here is some input. I am considering using AsyncAPI as a formalism to do Model-based design. This idea is that adding properties to our device ecosystem is first done by describing the properties in the form of a schema.yaml, and ideally using generator for the different bindings (mqtt/c++) and documentation we need. I have a prototype model repo, validated with AsyncStudio, and c++ generation produces code I can imagine to use in an embedded context, so far so good. One source of hesitation for me at this point is the complexity of aggregating several schema files. Ideally I do not wish to ask my contributors to add new channels, components, messages, traits etc... is the same file. There are few example here and there on using refs, or python tooling to aggregate or split schema part, but it seems a bit fiddly to me at least, so I'm not sure this is the right way to go. Some tutorial and example material for "distributed" model files would be great. It seems quite natural to have for each functional blocs of technical domain in the system, a dedicated schema file, with channels, message, payload layouts, etc... that the framework is able to aggregate to one schema file that can be used for generation. Thanks and regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If you are a developer/architect/engineer on a team working to document AsyncAPI or a user who uses (wants to use) AsyncAPI to build something awesome, please help us by sharing your feedback about the tutorials you would like to see on the AsyncAPI website.
❔ Why do we need this survey?
Currently, AsyncAPI has two tutorials which are Streetlights and Streetlights - Interactive
We are working on making more tutorials that will help our users in the future.
📝 Questions
💭 How can I participate?
You can help by providing valuable feedback here, or if you are someone who can assist us in creating these tutorials please create an issue regarding it, we are always looking for contributors.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions