scope of txt file?

[esimers]

Sorry this technically isn't an "issue" but I could not use the contact email address given in the web article on Autodesk.

Was the intention of this txt file to have "all" the components for the API, because it seems to only scratch the surface. I believe there would need to be a deeper "scrape" of the sub-pages, correct? Possible there would need to be multiples for different sections of the API? Thanks! Have a super awesome day!

[wallabyway]

Hi @esimers,

We’re gradually improving the llms.txt and llms-full.txt files.

The llms-full.txt currently produces better results, though it only includes our public OpenAPI spec files and covers a limited set of APS APIs.

We’ve also created a second file — llms.txt — which you can try. It includes links to a much broader set of APIs. However, in our testing, tools like Cursor didn’t pick up on sub-links as effectively, so it hasn’t performed as well as llms-full.txt.

We’re continuing to improve both files, and your feedback would be really helpful. Could you let us know which specific APIs you’re interested in?

[esimers]

Yes, certainly. I'm looking for anything Vault/Data related. Secondary thing's are Plant3d & Inventor.

…

On Mon, Jun 23, 2025, 6:00 PM Michael Beale ***@***.***> wrote: *wallabyway* left a comment (autodesk-platform-services/llmstxt#2) <#2 (comment)> Hi @esimers <https://github.com/esimers>, We’re gradually improving the llms.txt and llms-full.txt files. The llms-full.txt currently produces better results, though it only includes our public OpenAPI spec files and covers a limited set of APS APIs. We’ve also created a second file — llms.txt — which you can try. It includes links to a much broader set of APIs. However, in our testing, tools like Cursor didn’t pick up on sub-links as effectively, so it hasn’t performed as well as llms-full.txt. We’re continuing to improve both files, and your feedback would be really helpful. Could you let us know which specific APIs you’re interested in? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BPVS3CXBX7PM5JCMZE6NIM33FCBJJAVCNFSM6AAAAAB76G5KTCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDSOJYGIYDSNJSGI> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[esimers]

Any more updates on this from your end? Thanks for replying! On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 6:12 PM Earle Simers ***@***.***> wrote:

…

Yes, certainly. I'm looking for anything Vault/Data related. Secondary thing's are Plant3d & Inventor. On Mon, Jun 23, 2025, 6:00 PM Michael Beale ***@***.***> wrote: > *wallabyway* left a comment (autodesk-platform-services/llmstxt#2) > <#2 (comment)> > > Hi @esimers <https://github.com/esimers>, > > We’re gradually improving the llms.txt and llms-full.txt files. > > The llms-full.txt currently produces better results, though it only > includes our public OpenAPI spec files and covers a limited set of APS APIs. > > We’ve also created a second file — llms.txt — which you can try. It > includes links to a much broader set of APIs. However, in our testing, > tools like Cursor didn’t pick up on sub-links as effectively, so it hasn’t > performed as well as llms-full.txt. > > We’re continuing to improve both files, and your feedback would be really > helpful. Could you let us know which specific APIs you’re interested in? > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#2 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BPVS3CXBX7PM5JCMZE6NIM33FCBJJAVCNFSM6AAAAAB76G5KTCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDSOJYGIYDSNJSGI> > . > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >