Skip to content

Have some doubts about the calculation of evaluation indicators. #99

Open
@swing148

Description

@swing148

Hello, your paper is really good!
But for fid50k_ full.There are some problems with the evaluation index of full.
"we report the FID between 50k generated and all real images" in your paper.
However, Pokemon has only more than 800 data sets, and the number of generated images is greater than the number of real images. Is this comparison really accurate? Although the initial literature did not mention this issue[1]. However, this document mentions that generating 50k images will lack diversity[2].
We try to study this problem in full dataset(<1000 and >800), half dataset(500) and 100 dataset vs same number generated images,We find that FID decreases as the number of images increases. Of course, generated 50k images vs full dataset(<1000 and >800)is least.The evaluation method we use is [3].
[1]Heusel M , Ramsauer H , Unterthiner T , et al. GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Local Nash Equilibrium[J]. 2017.
[2]Konstantin Shmelkov, Cordelia Schmid, Karteek Alahari.How good is my GAN[C].ECCV,2018,218-234.
[3]https://github.com/mSEitzer/pytorch-fid

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions