Skip to content

Conversation

@NorahXiong
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Parent issue: autowarefoundation/autoware_core#419

How was this PR tested?

Notes for reviewers

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

@github-actions
Copy link

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

@NorahXiong
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mitsudome-r @youtalk Could you please review this PR and enable the CI settings as the preceeding PRs rely on it: https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware_core/actions/runs/14569770270/job/40864955684?pr=426

@youtalk
Copy link
Member

youtalk commented Apr 21, 2025

@mitsudome-r @isamu-takagi @yukkysaito Has the discussion about this porting already been completed? I heard that the RTC needs to be fixed.

@mitsudome-r
Copy link
Member

Yes, I will be talking with @takayuki5168 and @yukkysaito sometime this week to discuss about porting of the RTC messages. We should refine it to make it more generic.

@mitsudome-r
Copy link
Member

@NorahXiong Sorry, but could you wait a little on working on this task for now?

@NorahXiong
Copy link
Contributor Author

@NorahXiong Sorry, but could you wait a little on working on this task for now?

Sure. Then I will work on other packages first.

@liuXinGangChina
Copy link
Contributor

liuXinGangChina commented May 8, 2025

hi mits san @mitsudome-r

Any feedback for this msg porting?

@mitsudome-r
Copy link
Member

mitsudome-r commented May 8, 2025

@liuXinGangChina
We might have to refactor the message to be more generic. I have talked with planning team, but we could consider dropping the porting of behavior_velocity_planner_detection_area package from phase 2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

run:build-and-test-differential Run build-and-test-differential workflow

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants