-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
feat: porting tier4_rtc_msgs from tier4_autoware_msgs to autoware_internal_msgs #60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat: porting tier4_rtc_msgs from tier4_autoware_msgs to autoware_internal_msgs #60
Conversation
Signed-off-by: NorahXiong <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NorahXiong <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NorahXiong <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: NorahXiong <[email protected]>
|
Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project! 🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode. Please ensure:
|
|
@mitsudome-r @youtalk Could you please review this PR and enable the CI settings as the preceeding PRs rely on it: https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware_core/actions/runs/14569770270/job/40864955684?pr=426 |
|
@mitsudome-r @isamu-takagi @yukkysaito Has the discussion about this porting already been completed? I heard that the RTC needs to be fixed. |
|
Yes, I will be talking with @takayuki5168 and @yukkysaito sometime this week to discuss about porting of the RTC messages. We should refine it to make it more generic. |
|
@NorahXiong Sorry, but could you wait a little on working on this task for now? |
Sure. Then I will work on other packages first. |
|
hi mits san @mitsudome-r Any feedback for this msg porting? |
|
@liuXinGangChina |
Description
Parent issue: autowarefoundation/autoware_core#419
How was this PR tested?
Notes for reviewers
None.
Effects on system behavior
None.