This document outlines the comprehensive testing strategy for the DKNet Framework to achieve and maintain 99% code coverage across all core library projects.
- Core Libraries: 99% line coverage, 95% branch coverage
- EfCore Libraries: 95% line coverage, 90% branch coverage
- Service Libraries: 90% line coverage, 85% branch coverage
- Template Projects: 85% line coverage, 80% branch coverage
- MSTest: Primary testing framework for most projects
- xUnit: Used in template projects and specific scenarios
- Shouldly: Assertion library for fluent assertions
- coverlet.collector: Code coverage collection
- ReportGenerator: Coverage report generation
- Codecov: Coverage reporting and tracking
Solution/
├── Core/
│ ├── DKNet.Fw.Extensions/ # Core extension methods
│ └── Fw.Extensions.Tests/ # 99% coverage target
├── EfCore/
│ ├── DKNet.EfCore.*/ # EF Core libraries
│ └── EfCore.*.Tests/ # 95% coverage target
├── Services/
│ ├── DKNet.Svc.*/ # Service libraries
│ └── Svc.*.Tests/ # 90% coverage target
└── Templates/
└── */Tests/ # 85% coverage target
- Scope: Individual methods and classes
- Focus: Business logic, edge cases, error handling
- Coverage: Line, branch, and method coverage
- Scope: Component interactions
- Focus: Database operations, external services
- Coverage: End-to-end workflows
- Scope: Architectural constraints
- Focus: Dependency rules, naming conventions
- Tool: ArchUnitNET
- Runs on all pushes and PRs
- Tests entire solution
- Generates comprehensive coverage reports
- Uploads to Codecov
- Comments PR with coverage summary
- Runs on Core/EfCore changes only
- Enforces 95% minimum coverage threshold
- Fails build if coverage drops below threshold
- Specialized for critical libraries
<Include>
[DKNet*]*
</Include>
<Exclude>
[*.Tests]*
[*Tests]*
[*.TestObjects]*
[*TestDataLayer]*
</Exclude>- HTML Reports: Detailed coverage analysis
- Cobertura XML: Standard format for CI/CD
- JSON Summary: Programmatic access to metrics
- Line Coverage: Percentage of code lines executed
- Branch Coverage: Percentage of decision branches taken
- Method Coverage: Percentage of methods called
- Assembly Coverage: Per-assembly breakdown
- Arrange-Act-Assert: Clear test structure
- Single Responsibility: One concept per test
- Descriptive Names: Test intent is clear
- Edge Case Coverage: Null values, empty collections, boundaries
- Error Path Testing: Exception scenarios covered
- Focus on Business Logic: Prioritize critical paths
- Mock External Dependencies: Isolate unit under test
- Test Both Success and Failure: Happy path and error scenarios
- Boundary Value Testing: Min/max values, edge cases
- Null Reference Testing: Handle null inputs gracefully
- All tests must pass before merge
- Coverage thresholds enforced per project type
- No reduction in coverage allowed
- Architectural rules validated
[TestMethod]
public async Task ToListAsync_WithItems_ReturnsCorrectList()
{
// Arrange
var items = new[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
var asyncEnumerable = CreateAsyncEnumerable(items);
// Act
var result = await asyncEnumerable.ToListAsync();
// Assert
Assert.IsNotNull(result);
Assert.AreEqual(5, result.Count);
CollectionAssert.AreEqual(items, result.ToArray());
}[TestMethod]
public void GetPropertyValueShouldReturnNullForNullObject()
{
// Arrange
var propertyName = "Name";
// Act
var value = ((TestItem3)null).GetPropertyValue(propertyName);
// Assert
Assert.IsNull(value);
}- DKNet.Fw.Extensions: 93.1% line coverage ✅
- AsyncEnumerableExtensions: 100% coverage ✅
- TypeExtensions: Significantly improved ✅
- PropertyExtensions: Comprehensive coverage ✅
- EnumExtensions: Enhanced with edge cases ✅
- Added 21 new comprehensive unit tests
- Improved coverage from 85.2% to 93.1%
- Enhanced GitHub Actions automation
- Better coverage reporting and visualization
- Weekly Coverage Reviews: Track trends and identify gaps
- Automated Alerts: Notify on coverage drops
- Regular Refactoring: Improve test maintainability
- Performance Monitoring: Ensure test suite efficiency
- Mutation testing for test quality validation
- Performance benchmarking integration
- Visual coverage trend analysis
- Automated test generation for edge cases
Note: This testing strategy ensures the DKNet Framework maintains high quality standards while enabling rapid development and confident deployment of new features.