Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Control covers in an alternate geographical location #194

Open
3 tasks done
gwilford opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
3 tasks done

Control covers in an alternate geographical location #194

gwilford opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@gwilford
Copy link

gwilford commented Jun 3, 2024

Checklist

  • I have filled out the template to the best of my ability.
  • This only contains 1 feature request (if you have multiple feature requests, open one feature request for each feature request).
  • This issue is not a duplicate feature request of previous feature requests.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

The geo location and sun positioning appears tied to the location of the HA instance. While this makes perfect sense as a default, I'm managing a few smart devices at a remote location for my elderly parents.

Describe the solution you'd like

I've configured the remote location with it's own sun2 instance in my local HA and it would be great to be able to use this as an optional config item or to input the individual lat/long location of the cover if the geo position is used directly.

Describe alternatives you've considered

None

Additional context

None

@basbruss
Copy link
Owner

basbruss commented Jun 4, 2024

While it may appear straightforward to incorporate adjustable locations for sun positioning, the reality is more complex. The current sun positioning data is sourced from Home Assistant's core sun integration, which relies on the location settings of your Home Assistant instance. To enable location adjustments, I would need to reimplement a portion of the sun integration within this one. This seems somewhat redundant and could potentially introduce unnecessary complexity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants