Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion involving !skip #71

Open
M-TGH opened this issue Jun 16, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Suggestion involving !skip #71

M-TGH opened this issue Jun 16, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@M-TGH
Copy link

M-TGH commented Jun 16, 2015

Whenever wait list is full it locks it then skips... blaah blah blah.

Wouldn't it be a better idea to, put djcycle on > skip song > move dj > put djcycle off?

@samhmills
Copy link
Member

Are you talking about skip or lockskip?

If you are actually talking about !lockskip, then yes, I would tend to agree with you that Cycle might be a more efficient way to go. I have deployed this in the bot that runs in the "Just a chill room..."

However, this probably needs to be discussed with Benzi as he knows the codebase a lot better than I do

@M-TGH
Copy link
Author

M-TGH commented Jun 17, 2015

Well both I guess, still kind of confused by the change in !lockskippos to !skippos as now !skip and !lockskip do the same don't they?

@Dazzuh
Copy link
Contributor

Dazzuh commented Jun 17, 2015

^ yeah
!skip is essentially now !lockskip, and !forceskip is now !skip.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants