Support no_std executors

[Stupremee]

Since async / await is available in no_std environment now, agnostik should add a no_std runtime.

I'm not sure if it should implement an own no_std executor or using an already existing crate.

[richardanaya]

I have one written here if it helps at all.

https://github.com/richardanaya/executor

I'm pretty interested in collaborating. I had a similar idea in my own package, but i'd be willing to conform to Agnostik's interface if its possible.

[vertexclique]

Hi @richardanaya ! Great news, I would be very happy to incorporate your executor. The first thing comes into my mind is using your executor as defacto no_std executor. Is it ok at your end? Feel free to open a PR if that suits to you :)

[richardanaya]

Absolutely!

[Stupremee]

if you want you can open a PR and implement your executor. You just have to uncomment the runtime_nostd in Cargo.toml and ci.sh and remove the core dependency.

[richardanaya]

Thanks! I tried integrating it this afternoon, I found some changes i need to make to my library to be more compliant.

…

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:21 PM stu ***@***.***> wrote: if you want you can open a PR and implement your executor. You just have to uncomment the runtime_nostd in Cargo.toml and ci.sh and remove the core dependency. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACHZGSXMNZWHDEZNQN5JMTRJEI5TANCNFSM4LSHQR6Q> .

[richardanaya]

#7

[richardanaya]

FYI, i'm no longer working on this as per #7. Someone else is free to take over.