Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What is a good enough Precision@K and MAP@K value? #709

Open
akash-kwiff opened this issue Feb 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

What is a good enough Precision@K and MAP@K value? #709

akash-kwiff opened this issue Feb 27, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@akash-kwiff
Copy link

Not really an issue, I am just trying to understand what Precision@K and MAP@K values are considered good enough?
I have tried tuning the hyper-parameters and experimented with cleaning my data (removing user-item interactions that are really low and very high) but the precision@10 never seem to go beyond 0.23 and MAP@10 - 0.15

I understand "what is good" depends on my scenario, but is it possible to achieve higher results for Precision@K / MAP@K?

@fkurushin
Copy link

Hi @akash-kwiff for recommender systems values about 15 % seems to be good enough. It is all up to your data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants