【question】Is ast-types not compatible with estree?

[alamhubb]

Hello, I now have a custom extended estreeAst, which extends some custom ast types. I need to convert the extended ast to the estree standard ast. I am looking for an open source library that can achieve this function. I learned about ast-types,

builders.stringLiteral

But I found that there is no stringLiteral in estreeAst, but Literals that are uniformly used for stringLiteral, numberLiteral, etc.

Also

estree2022

extend interface ClassBody {
    body: [ MethodDefinition | PropertyDefinition | StaticBlock ];
}

ast-types

interface ClassBody extends Omit<Declaration, "type"> {
        type: "ClassBody";
        body: (K.MethodDefinitionKind | K.VariableDeclaratorKind | K.ClassPropertyDefinitionKind | K.ClassPropertyKind | K.ClassPrivatePropertyKind | K.ClassAccessorPropertyKind | K.ClassMethodKind | K.ClassPrivateMethodKind | K.StaticBlockKind | K.TSDeclareMethodKind | K.TSCallSignatureDeclarationKind | K.TSConstructSignatureDeclarationKind | K.TSIndexSignatureKind | K.TSMethodSignatureKind | K.TSPropertySignatureKind)[];
    }

I found that the node names in ast-types are inconsistent with those in estree, so I am a little confused. I hope to get your reply. Thank you.

I apologize if I disturbed you.

[alamhubb]

Hello, I think I understand the correct meaning of compatible in ast-types. It can process estree standard AST, but it does not mean that the generated AST is estree standard AST.