Replies: 3 comments
-
The web version uses a long outdated version of BirdNET, as far as I know. But people still seem to use it a lot. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
People are using it because it's easily accessible (no installation required) and they also believe its results accurately represent the BirdNET model's capabilities |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ok, I added a few hints on the upload page that specify the model version as V1.0 (the one from the original BirdNET paper). We'll update the demo page and replace it with a Gradio interface just like the Single File analysis tab. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have been using BirdNET web analyzer at https://birdnet.cornell.edu/api/ to verify some of BirdNET-Go captures and I have been wondering why web analyzer produces so different results. Today I installed BirdNET Analyzer Win GUI 1.3.1 version and it produces same results as BirdNET-Go.
Here are example results for same file analyzed in Web version and v1.3.1 Windows GUI version
Web version results are so way off that I would recommend taking it offline until it is fixed
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions