[PM-11612] Use SchedulerBuilder to configure Quartz

[lahma]

🎟️ Tracking

Checking use of error-prone configuration property usage instead of using strongly-typed builder.

📔 Objective

Quartz has SchedulerBuilder API which hides nasty configuration string properties.

📸 Screenshots

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[bitwarden-bot]

Thank you for your contribution! We've added this to our internal Community PR board for review.
ID: PM-11612

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – ad46a71c-4f40-448c-b24a-f58280611a0d

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

[djsmith85]

@lahma Thank you for your contribution 🎉 Your changes are looking good and greatly simplify the setup. I went ahead and updated the branch from main and fixed any conflicts. I'm requesting a review from @dani-garcia regarding my changes made here.

Thanks again for your contribution, but more importantly for creating such a great library as Quartz.net 🙌 ❤️

Kind regards,
Daniel

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 53.27%. Comparing base (3ad4860) to head (f017479).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/Core/Jobs/BaseJobsHostedService.cs	0.00%	25 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4729      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   53.28%   53.27%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1906     1906              
  Lines       84973    84972       -1     
  Branches     7639     7640       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        45275    45272       -3     
- Misses      37944    37945       +1     
- Partials     1754     1755       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[dani-garcia]

Changes LGTM, thanks!