Acccedence; Concretely; BNB #268
Description
Dear,
Wouldn't it be better to implement Cryptography that defies regulations? Since I finished the concept and there are 2 choices between approving Cryptography only or 100% converting your Crypto into Syamailcoin? Will SAI-15 be a priority for Developers to run this? Let's look at it mathematically and this is Reference (https://syamailcointheogwhitepaper.tiiny.site) SAI-15 Key Generation and Encryption Framework
def generate_key(self):
return secrets.token_bytes(399)
def encrypt(self, plaintext, key):
if len(key) != 399:
raise ValueError("Key must be exactly 399 bytes")
ciphertext = bytearray()
for i, byte in enumerate(plaintext):
key_byte = key[i % 399]
ciphertext.append(byte ^ key_byte)
return bytes(ciphertext)
// Message Schedule and Compression for SAI-15
// Initialization with 399-byte key
K = secrets.token_bytes(399) // 399-byte cryptographic key
P = bytearray(plaintext) // Input plaintext as byte array
R = 64 // Number of rounds (configurable)
// Processing Steps
For i from 0 to R-1:
// XOR-based transformation with key
S[i] = P[i] ⊕ K[i % 399]
// Apply Byzantine Fault Tolerance check (BFT)
if BFT_check(S[i], i):
S[i] = rotate_left(S[i], i % 8) + i
// Sustainable Vault capacity adjustment via PKI
S[i] = (S[i] * PKI_factor(i)) % 256
// Final state update
H[i] = S[i] + (H[i-1] if i > 0 else 0)
// Final 399-byte hash calculation
H_SAI = bytes(H)
// Mathematical Representation
HSAI[i] = (P[i] ⊕ K[i % 399]) * PKI_factor(i) + rotate_left(S[i], i % 8) + i
Where:
- P[i]: Plaintext byte at position i
- K[i % 399]: Key byte cycled through 399 bytes
- PKI_factor(i): Public Key Infrastructure scaling factor (dynamic based on position)
- rotate_left(x, n): Left rotation of x by n bits
- i: Position in the sequence (0 to R-1)
And How does this work? First of all you can buy Entropy Pool and Cipher (QSC01) physical product QSC01 for create Heterodyning 144 kHz slow down to 22 kHz and implement Heterodyning to the Place of Communication either outside the blockchain or the underlying process of your coin. From EYL inc and Quside Company.
Proof of Fraction is that the Participant must look for the Cubic Fraction from the smallest which is 0.0002231668236 to 1 as much as 50x and given a time of 14.47 Minutes or 868.2 seconds as long as the Circulating Supply touches 9,470,000 to 4,735,001 and when the Supply touches 4,735,000 the time will be divided by 12, 72.35 seconds the time given and when the Supply touches 1,280,000 the time will be divided by 1.96, 36.91326530612244898 seconds time is given and when Supply touches 185.000, 18.83329862557267805 seconds is given.
Hydra Sustainable Vault? It is a system to create a Drained Qubit in such a way that Anyone who has a certain number of Syamailcoin can fly it with Hydra up to 941 transit point and 941 it is the return of your Syamailcoin from the transited Node, How do we get started? First you have to create a Hydra system on the Blockchain or Digital, Two you can validate checksum with SLH-DSA, Three You provide a vault for them and the time given is 14.47 Minutes Hydra Sustainable Vault flies Syamailcoin.
If you don't agree yet, I hope this concept applies to the Crypto you put forward, Open Discussions and Criticism already.
The third image is the formula for the Underlying which should be listed on the running math of both coding and blockchain before being verified, I can't give all but hope it helps.
First I thank you and I'm not good at drawing Hydra, it's just a question and it's just a question, Why don't we change the Blockchain System to Hydra? How does this can work? Come here.
No Offense; Blockchain is where one person or group in one address can send transactions to the next party without bank intermediaries and double spending, in Hydra when Alice sends 1 Million coins to Bob = The Hydra system running 14.47% Threshold of Maximum Nodes A.K.A 941 Nodes, 136,627 or 136 Nodes before Checksum with SAI-15 (Hydra so different than Hydra Sustainable Vault) and what the proof of math?. C=Σ F_I ^x³ / (x² + 15)
r/n when r it's rally on threshold < 14.47% and n it's nitrous on SAI-15.
When we can start? We have to create a Hydra System first and then the second is that we test the checksum verification with SAI-15. In Hydra Visualization we can see the transaction already flies and done, if rate on threshold < 14.47% Actived answer BNB transaction does not run temporarily until it reaches nitrous. So this is fair.
Analogy to Hydra and Proof of Fraction
If we relate this to Proof of Fraction in Hydra, then:
- M-P | M-S | S-P → Could represent stages in nitrous on SAI-15.
M (Middle Term) → T+941 on going.
P (Predicate) → Validation outcome (Threshold and Math Criteria).
S (Subject) → Transaction in process.
Thus, transaction validation can be explained using syllogistic structure!
- A-I-I, E-A-O, I-A-I.
Could represent different possible transaction results, depending on the fraction calculated in the PoF system.
Example:
A-I-I: All transactions meet a certain proof of fraction → Some transactions are validated.
E-A-O: No transactions meet the proof of fraction → All transactions are rejected.
I-A-I: Some transactions meet the proof of fraction → Some transactions are accepted.
A-I-I: All Threshold Adjust the criteria 14.47% → Done to checksum validation
E-A-O: If you are still at the rally on threshold → Transaction could not be completed.
I-A-I: Sender complete the validation process before it gets to the Receiver → Your Hydra it's completed.
Final Result: Alice prepares a certain amount of funds to send to Bob → Hydra System Perform checksum validation → If r (transaction could not be completed) / If n (transaction has been done) → Complete.
If sending from the Proof of Fraction Consensus Mechanism is not from the Investment or Wallet results, then after checksum validation → Acccedence approves 0,0002231668236 Successful Participants up to 1 (Acccedence it's like The dynamics of change from time to time with limited real time).