Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upfront text about how to cite BOUT++ #40

Open
ZedThree opened this issue Sep 5, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Upfront text about how to cite BOUT++ #40

ZedThree opened this issue Sep 5, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ZedThree
Copy link
Member

ZedThree commented Sep 5, 2018

We should have something on the homepage about how to cite BOUT++, preferably with something people can just copy+paste

@ZedThree ZedThree self-assigned this Sep 5, 2018
@bendudson
Copy link
Contributor

Agreed. There are several possible papers; we really need a more recent review paper than https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377814000816 which has some authors but is notably missing @ZedThree, @JosephThomasParker and @d7919 which I think rules it out. With the latest release and developments in OpenMP and vectorisation, perhaps some kind of software paper could be submitted?

@ZedThree
Copy link
Member Author

ZedThree commented Sep 5, 2018

I am at a hackday for the Citation File Format, which might provide a solution. It can include additional papers that should be cited as well.

@JosephThomasParker
Copy link
Contributor

Deja vu. This discussion is only allowed when one of us is at a CFF hackday. :)

I'm currently writing up the OpenMP/vectorization changes. If we can't find a journal, STFC does have a technical reports process.

@dschwoerer
Copy link
Contributor

Any chance to get this on the website?
Would be nice if I could just copy paste this :-)

Where should this go? Documentation? Own section?

@johnomotani
Copy link
Contributor

Bump. A list of the Zenodo DOIs would be nice to have too :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants