-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upfront text about how to cite BOUT++ #40
Comments
Agreed. There are several possible papers; we really need a more recent review paper than https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377814000816 which has some authors but is notably missing @ZedThree, @JosephThomasParker and @d7919 which I think rules it out. With the latest release and developments in OpenMP and vectorisation, perhaps some kind of software paper could be submitted? |
I am at a hackday for the Citation File Format, which might provide a solution. It can include additional papers that should be cited as well. |
Deja vu. This discussion is only allowed when one of us is at a CFF hackday. :) I'm currently writing up the OpenMP/vectorization changes. If we can't find a journal, STFC does have a technical reports process. |
Any chance to get this on the website? Where should this go? Documentation? Own section? |
Bump. A list of the Zenodo DOIs would be nice to have too :-) |
We should have something on the homepage about how to cite BOUT++, preferably with something people can just copy+paste
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: