You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: expanded_field_notes.txt
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -83,4 +83,4 @@ Quality control flags are as follows:
83
83
84
84
----------
85
85
Rank [ in srdb_studies.csv ]
86
-
Note this score (1-4, with 1 being "highly relevant" and 4 "not relevant") is not an assessment of the study's scientific merit or validity; it's simply a judgement, based on reading the abstract and title, of how relevant this study is to the database (i.e., is it likely to have appropriate data?).
86
+
Note this score (1-4, with 1 being "highly relevant" and 4 "not relevant") is not an assessment of the study's scientific merit or validity; it's simply a judgment, based on reading the abstract and title, of how relevant this study is to the database (i.e., is it likely to have appropriate data?).
0 commit comments