Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Aesthetic Inconsistency in Meaning of w Between Exclusivity Calculations #270

Open
bstewart opened this issue Mar 20, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@bstewart
Copy link
Owner

Pointed out by Francisco Santamarina---line 101 of calcfrex() and exclusivity() use w in opposite ways (one as the weight on exclusivity, one as the weight on frequency). These are separate functions so won't cause any conflicts with each other, but obviously it isn't aesthetically great and definitely no issues if people use weights of .5.

@bstewart bstewart self-assigned this Mar 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant