Skip to content

lrn_weight should depend on learning step #22

Open
@akavi1

Description

@akavi1

Problem: Right now, it looks like the lrn_weight is a single number for all learning cards. However, the probability of getting a card right is partially dependent on which learning step the learn card is at.

Solution: There should be a separate lrn_weight for each learning step. Instead of grabbing the total number of learning cards and multiplying by the weight, it should grab the number of learning cards at each step and have a separate weight for each.

Further, this line of thinking can be applied to review cards as well. We can differentiate young weights (interval <21 days) from mature weights (interval >=21 days <100 days) from supermature weights (interval >=100 days). Doing this with review cards might require a separate larger no_days variable

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions