Replies: 2 comments
-
|
I picked 100g, since it would make it easier for various under-the-hood number manipulations, and avoid potentially frustrating situations, where a few leftover grams are not displayed (avoiding loose ends, in other words). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Make everything a round number of grams internally. When displaying stuff in imperial units, multiply the real value in the imperial unit by a constant so that it would make the number round. Essentially, use an adjusted scale for the purposes of value display. So, for this 100g internally, but 0.25 lbs if displayed in lbs, which means a ~1.134x multiplier. In other words, you can adjust the g->lbs coeff to a rounder number. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Context: #6014
There has been a disagreement about whether weights ranging from
101g to 120gshould be rounded to100gor110g. After a lengthy dev chat without resolution, we're opening a poll to let players decide.Option 1: Round 113g to 100g
0.10 kgis more visually intuitive than0.11 kg.0.10 kgitems sum up neatly to2.30 kg, whereas0.11 kgrequires extra thought step to determine it's2.53 kg.110gis neither 'accurate' or 'readable' (does that turban really benefits player if it was110ginstead of100g?).101gto119gto100gfor more intuitive UI.Option 2: Round 113g to 110g
Option 3: Keep 113g as-is
113gwas chosen to display as0.25 lbsin the UI when pounds were the default unit.The poll will be open from
2025-01-31 02:00 UTCto2025-02-07 11:59 UTC.41 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions