Skip to content

The performance of MLP is bad #19

@HuangYaowei

Description

@HuangYaowei

I have run the code twice and I find that the performance of FCN and Resnet is normal but in MLP the performance is very low.
FCN

0.034404267222644426 0.8465473055839539
0.014002826408698009 0.8491048812866211

MLP

2.7152027130126952 0.21994884312152863

RESNET

9.826100923909018e-05, 0.8184143304824829

But in the paper, it is said to be good. Is there something wrong?

Activity

kirathes

kirathes commented on Aug 22, 2023

@kirathes

I encountered the same problem as you, the performance of MLP is not good:
loss: 2.7749 - accuracy: 0.2026

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

        Participants

        @HuangYaowei@kirathes

        Issue actions

          The performance of MLP is bad · Issue #19 · cauchyturing/UCR_Time_Series_Classification_Deep_Learning_Baseline