You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, we implemented causal effect estimation which is guaranteed to be unbiased (and even variance minimizing) for directed acyclic graphs (DAGs): regressing on all parents. However, this does not work if an adjacent edge is undirected. Therefore, we have to implement causal effect estimation using valid adjustment sets in completed partially directed acyclic graphs (CPDAGs) which are the output of the PC algorithm, see for example: https://www.jmlr.org/papers/v21/20-175.html.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, we implemented causal effect estimation which is guaranteed to be unbiased (and even variance minimizing) for directed acyclic graphs (DAGs): regressing on all parents. However, this does not work if an adjacent edge is undirected. Therefore, we have to implement causal effect estimation using valid adjustment sets in completed partially directed acyclic graphs (CPDAGs) which are the output of the PC algorithm, see for example: https://www.jmlr.org/papers/v21/20-175.html.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: