Schema: NER restriction

[matyaskopp]

Current schema allows this situation:

<name type="LOC">
  <kinesic type="applause">
    <desc>Oklaski</desc>
  </kinesic>
</name>

ParlaMint/Schema/ParlaMint-TEI.ana.rng

Lines 112 to 121 in 92ba447

	<define name="ner_tokens">
	<oneOrMore>
	<choice>
	<ref name="word"/>
	<ref name="punct"/>
	<ref name="ner"/>
	<ref name="comment"/>
	</choice>
	</oneOrMore>
	</define>

The schema should be restricted in this way:

• every named entity should contain oneOrMore named entities or words.
• And zeroOrMore comments

Related issue: #84

[TomazErjavec]

I agree that should be restricted, but

• Did you actually find such cases in the corpora? At least for the example that you gave, as far as I see, it doesn't exists in the PL corpus. I would be surprised if it did exist, as incidents were exceluded from annotation, so the system would in fact be annotating an empty string as NER
• It will make the content model more complicated, in fact I'm not really sure how to impletement such a restriction, would have to study RelaxNG first.

Not saying I won't do it, just maybe not straight away.

[matyaskopp]

Did you actually find such cases in the corpora

No, I have built it based on the wrongly understood example from #84

IIt will make the content model more complicated, in fact I'm not really sure how to impletement such a restriction, would have to study RelaxNG first.

I don't know either. (CZ NER already made schema quite complicated...)

Not saying I won't do it, just maybe not straight away.

Ok, let's keep this issue for the next releases

[TomazErjavec]

This is obviously "future"....