You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What are the licensing terms of the kernel patch in Code/kernel/devterm-4.19_v01.patch ? It seems to be GPL-3.0 due to the LICENSE file, but that's not compatible with GPL-2.0, under which terms the Linux kernel is distributed. I would expect one of these licenses for this patch:
GPL-2.0
GPL-2.0+
LGPL-2.0
LGPL-2.0+
LGPL-2.1
LGPL-2.1+
Same goes for the patches in Code/patch/armbian_build_a06/ . I suspect some of these are completely Rockchip's work and that none of them were licensed as GPL-3.0 by their copyright holders, but this is not documented (except that certain files created by these patches have comments indicating GPL-2.0 or GPL-2.0+).
(Changing the repo-wide LICENSE file to GPL-2.0+ would trivially fix this issue.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What are the licensing terms of the kernel patch in Code/kernel/devterm-4.19_v01.patch ? It seems to be GPL-3.0 due to the LICENSE file, but that's not compatible with GPL-2.0, under which terms the Linux kernel is distributed. I would expect one of these licenses for this patch:
Same goes for the patches in Code/patch/armbian_build_a06/ . I suspect some of these are completely Rockchip's work and that none of them were licensed as GPL-3.0 by their copyright holders, but this is not documented (except that certain files created by these patches have comments indicating GPL-2.0 or GPL-2.0+).
(Changing the repo-wide LICENSE file to GPL-2.0+ would trivially fix this issue.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: