New tag for 2017 data

[dmajumder]

Starting a new issue to track the developments for a tag for 2017 data using 92X release.
Can we have the experts update the latest recipes:
@alefisico @skyriacoCMS @jkarancs @lbenato
May be we start with the JetToolBox recipe in CMSSW_9_2_X?

[alefisico]

do we have any timescale for this? just to know since I am very busy currently on other stuff

[dmajumder]

@alefisico the timescale is as usual "ASAP" because we are planning to adapt this package to monitor triggers. See my reply to Lisa's email on the B2G HN:
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/b2g/1055/1/1.html

If the JetToolbox in CMSSW_9_1_X works out of the box in CMSSW_9_2_X then it is very straightforward.
I ran with the CMSSW_9_1_X JetToolBox in CMSSW_9_2_6 and at least it did not crash, but we have to update a lot of stuff I think. Is there anybody else who can help with the development?

[alefisico]

that is main problem, it does not.
There were some changes in the unscheduled mode that changes everything in the jetToolbox. I'll try to work on them asap, but I have some other deadlines now.

[dmajumder]

indeed, I think there is a Task module than now needs to be used.
Can you specify a time line (no pressure)? In the meanwhile, I can at least try to make the other objects work in the workflow.

[skyriacoCMS]

Hello all, I have a random question. Why do the met variables get stored as vectors and not as simple floats in our ntuple? Shouldn't it be a single number per event? Cheers, *Savvas Kyriacou* *Department of Physics and Astronomy * *Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey * *CERN B8 R-020 ,__, (o.o) /),,,,) " " *

…

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:51 PM, dmajumder ***@***.***> wrote: indeed, I think there is a Task module than now needs to be used. Can you specify a time line (no pressure)? In the meanwhile, I can at least try to make the other objects work in the workflow. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#80 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHCcD7opo0P622jZ3pF97r_-2GCK-NGEks5sNiDlgaJpZM4OVabZ> .

[dmajumder]

@skyriacoCMS probably it is historical. I agree we can change the VPSet to PSet.

[alefisico]

@dmajumder Is there any target release? any CMSSW_9_2_X?
About the jetToolbox, there is an easy (and temporary?) fix that should work now. I can check it with the B2GAnaFwk now, although it should be transparent to the framework.
also, can you create a 92X working branch?

[dmajumder]

@alefisico the target cmssw release should be the latest CMSSW_9_2_X. I have started working in CMSSW_9_2_6 which I think is the most recent.
New development branch created
https://github.com/cmsb2g/B2GAnaFW/tree/CMSSW_9_2_X_V0

[alefisico]

ok, the code runs and including the latest version of the toolbox:
https://github.com/cms-jet/JetToolbox/tree/jetToolbox_91X_v1
BUT, the output file is empty.. @dmajumder do you have the same?