host groups

[mhorne484]

I would love to see some organisation of hosts, could there be a feature to add groups?

for example, a web group that could contain all web servers? a mail group for mail servers and mailing list servers? workstations for local machines?

[stefwalter]

What would you do with such groups? Just visually separate them?

CC @petervo @andreasn

[mhorne484]

yes, we have a long list of servers (many, many virtual) that I have in
my host list.
I would love to group them so I can see servers separate from our local
workstations.
Then I can have sections for each category of server too. just an
organisational tweak :)

I guess you could go further and have 'group summary' stats on the dashboard but just having them in categories would help with handling 20+ hosts.

On 21/09/15 14:51, Stef Walter wrote:

What would you do with such groups? Just visually separate them?

CC @petervo https://github.com/petervo @andreasn
https://github.com/andreasn

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2791 (comment).

[stefwalter]

@michaelwemoto Is this something you're interested in working on? I've placed it on our ideas page:

https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/wiki/Ideas

[mhorne484]

@stefwalter Unfortunately I'm not so much a dev as an admin, I wouldn't know where to begin. sorry I couldn't be of more help.

[stefwalter]

Makes sense. Hopefully someone will pick this up at some point. It may fit better once we have a more complete dashboard. It's at the top of the ideas page.

[roskogabor]

Hello guys, is there an update on this topic? I'm new cockpit user and have the same idea and if there is somebody who working on it I would like to help or if there isn't I will start to working on it.

[marusak]

I am afraid there is no update.
If I understand this correctly, this would go on the dashboard page, right? This page is being obsoleted and the hosts are going to be listed in a different place. We are currently making design for that, so we might need to take this issue into consideration as well.

[roskogabor]

@marusak How can I get more details about the changes?

[marusak]

@garrett is currently designing it.
Mockup can be seen here: https://garrett.github.io/cockpit-mockweb/navigation2/
To see the list of hosts, click on top left corner.

[garrett]

While at the face-to-face meeting during DevConf at the end of Jan, I wanted to have automatic grouping of some sort, but rethought the idea as the auto-grouping didn't make sense.

Since we're going to drop the graphs (as focused dashboard tooling would be better than anything we could provide), Cockpit would be able to scale to support additional hosts. Having some sort of grouping, as suggested in this issue, would help to make sense of a larger number of hosts.

(The alternative is to rename the hosts to be descriptive, such as web-server.company.tld instead of silly things like banana and time-machine. An admin using Cockpit might not have the ability to rename the hosts network-wide — and renaming hosts in existing environments may break many things.)

TL;DR: After seeing this issue* and reading the request, I think grouping makes sense and would like to work it into the dashboard mockup.

* (thanks, @roskogabor, for asking about an update and then @marusak for mentioning me)

---

I think we'd have an ungrouped list of hosts by default (and don't show the group title). When the first group is made, it should then show the custom groups first, then the "ungrouped" group of hosts.

Adding hosts to a group could be done in the edit host dialog, with a dropdown of groups with a "new group" option that would then show an input field for the new group name.

Additionally, when editing the hosts list with a toggle (as it's not a common occurance and the remove and edit buttons could otherwise be clicked too easily), we could have an edit group option exposed as well. Clicking it could then edit the group from a top-down instead of bottom-up approach: It would show a list of hosts and allow you to check them to move the hosts into that group.

In other words: Dynamic groups and groups are set in the host config settings (where colors are currently set). We could also possibly have group editing (once groups are active).

A mockup would probably be a bit easier to understand than my explanation above, so I'll try to work it in.

No promises on if it'd make it in or when, however. It would have to be done on a second pass. A first pass would include existing functionality (minus the graphs). We would ideally follow back up with another iteration or two to add status and/or group support.

But I do think this is would be a useful feature to have. Let's see what we can do. 😉

[pwFoo]

Additional nice feature would be to trigger updates for host groups?